Cambridge University Press & Assessment has established a new framework which they believe can ensure ethical use of AI in language learning.

Focused around six key principles, the paper’s suggested framework aims to guarantee that the use of AI in language learning can bring benefits to English learners, as to do this teaching must use a “human-centred approach”.

Dr Nick Saville, Director of Thought Leadership at Cambridge University Press & Assessment and co-author of the paper, stated: “Despite the huge benefits AI can bring, without an ethical framework in place, it risks losing credibility and people’s trust.”

The paper emphasised that human examiners’ standards must be met. These standards require test providers to collect vigorous evidence to show how AI scores meet the same standards as highly skilled and experienced human examiners.

The company’s stated aim is to strengthen people’s trust in using AI systems, and help confirm that the use of AI remains fair and inclusive and prioritises security, privacy and consent.

“The rapid adoption of AI in English language learning and assessment can provide significant benefits for learners, teachers and institutions around the world, but it’s critical that it’s delivered ethically,” further explains Dr Nick Saville.

“The six principles we have defined will help deliver effective AI-based language learning and assessment solutions.

“By focusing on keeping a human in the loop and maintaining robust standards, we can carve out a future where teachers and learners feel safe and empowered to use new technology to reach their potential,” he continued.

The organisation has commented that “data privacy and consent are non-negotiable”. All parties involved must be clearly informed about what data is collected and how it will be used.

Moreover, the new framework highlighted the importance of language learning remaining a “human endeavour”. The human experience of acquiring and using languages cannot be replaced, the learning experience should only be enhanced through AI.

A human must always oversee the use of AI to ensure accountability on behalf of the test providers to allow for correction where oversight, clarity, or a correction is needed to ensure quality control.

Ethical questions surrounding sustainability were also covered. AI acts not only as a digital tool but also as a physical one, with real world environmental costs due to AI using vast amounts of energy-intensive computing power.

Cambridge University Press & Assessment have said “the environmental impact of AI use must be kept in mind when considering how AI should be developed or used.”

“To maintain high standards in learning and assessment, we must consistently put learners first. AI offers a world of possibilities, but with that comes a responsibility to make sure solutions are ethical, high-quality, and accessible,” added Francesca Woodward, Global Managing Director, English, at Cambridge University Press & Assessment.

“The use of AI in education lacks consistent regulation, which means we, as a sector, have a responsibility to champion innovation with integrity. We’ve defined these principles to provide a research-based framework that we encourage others to choose to adopt,” she continued.