Analysis: Bouattia’s firewall is student indifference
For most students, what happens at the top of the NUS is both unimportant and uninteresting. This saves its leadership from any real scrutiny

Only three things in life are certain: death, taxes, and Malia Bouattia-related controversies. This time it is a Select Committee report that has castigated her record on anti-Semitism, in response to which student leaders have called upon her to issue a formal apology for her remarks about Zionism, or resign.
But Bouattia, we may assume, is going nowhere: partly because she still has the support of many other student leaders, but mostly because the almost 2.3 million students at universities in the UK are almost entirely indifferent to the whole affair.
Of course, passionate cases in favour of and against Bouattia have been made by Jewish students and by fervent admirers of the NUS president. But the fact remains that the majority of those students who do not feel either ideologically devoted to or physically threatened by Bouattia’s comments regard the dispute as a remote struggle unrelated to their own interests, conducted by people they have never heard of.
Last time an NUS president was forced to resign in 2011, he was facing widespread discontent among students for his perceived failure to resist tuition fee rises. Without similar popular pressure, Bouattia’s position will be not be threatened
Features / Cambridge SU: has-been or never-was?
16 September 2025Arts / A walking tour of Art Deco Cambridge
16 September 2025Comment / Cambridge South is right to be ambitious
13 September 2025News / AstraZeneca pulls £200 million in funding for Cambridge research site
15 September 2025Features / Meet the Cambridge students whose names live up to their degree
9 September 2025