Analysis: Bouattia’s firewall is student indifference
For most students, what happens at the top of the NUS is both unimportant and uninteresting. This saves its leadership from any real scrutiny
Only three things in life are certain: death, taxes, and Malia Bouattia-related controversies. This time it is a Select Committee report that has castigated her record on anti-Semitism, in response to which student leaders have called upon her to issue a formal apology for her remarks about Zionism, or resign.
But Bouattia, we may assume, is going nowhere: partly because she still has the support of many other student leaders, but mostly because the almost 2.3 million students at universities in the UK are almost entirely indifferent to the whole affair.
Of course, passionate cases in favour of and against Bouattia have been made by Jewish students and by fervent admirers of the NUS president. But the fact remains that the majority of those students who do not feel either ideologically devoted to or physically threatened by Bouattia’s comments regard the dispute as a remote struggle unrelated to their own interests, conducted by people they have never heard of.
Last time an NUS president was forced to resign in 2011, he was facing widespread discontent among students for his perceived failure to resist tuition fee rises. Without similar popular pressure, Bouattia’s position will be not be threatened
- News / Cambridge University disables comments following Passover post backlash 24 April 2024
- Comment / Gown vs town? Local investment plans must remember Cambridge is not just a university24 April 2024
- News / Fitz students face ‘massive invasion of privacy’ over messy rooms23 April 2024
- Interviews / Gender Agenda on building feminist solidarity in Cambridge24 April 2024
- Comment / Does Lucy Cavendish need a billionaire bailout?22 April 2024