Analysis: Bouattia’s firewall is student indifference
For most students, what happens at the top of the NUS is both unimportant and uninteresting. This saves its leadership from any real scrutiny

Only three things in life are certain: death, taxes, and Malia Bouattia-related controversies. This time it is a Select Committee report that has castigated her record on anti-Semitism, in response to which student leaders have called upon her to issue a formal apology for her remarks about Zionism, or resign.
But Bouattia, we may assume, is going nowhere: partly because she still has the support of many other student leaders, but mostly because the almost 2.3 million students at universities in the UK are almost entirely indifferent to the whole affair.
Of course, passionate cases in favour of and against Bouattia have been made by Jewish students and by fervent admirers of the NUS president. But the fact remains that the majority of those students who do not feel either ideologically devoted to or physically threatened by Bouattia’s comments regard the dispute as a remote struggle unrelated to their own interests, conducted by people they have never heard of.
Last time an NUS president was forced to resign in 2011, he was facing widespread discontent among students for his perceived failure to resist tuition fee rises. Without similar popular pressure, Bouattia’s position will be not be threatened
News / Cambridge Chancellor hopeful accuses opponent of electoral malpractice
9 July 2025Interviews / ‘Disagreeing agreeably’: meet the three Caians chairing CUCA, CULA and CULC
9 July 2025Lifestyle / Reflections on rowing
10 July 2025News / Meta opens £12 million lab in Cambridge
11 July 2025Theatre / What even is a welfare officer?
9 July 2025