Analysis: Bouattia’s firewall is student indifference
For most students, what happens at the top of the NUS is both unimportant and uninteresting. This saves its leadership from any real scrutiny
Only three things in life are certain: death, taxes, and Malia Bouattia-related controversies. This time it is a Select Committee report that has castigated her record on anti-Semitism, in response to which student leaders have called upon her to issue a formal apology for her remarks about Zionism, or resign.
But Bouattia, we may assume, is going nowhere: partly because she still has the support of many other student leaders, but mostly because the almost 2.3 million students at universities in the UK are almost entirely indifferent to the whole affair.
Of course, passionate cases in favour of and against Bouattia have been made by Jewish students and by fervent admirers of the NUS president. But the fact remains that the majority of those students who do not feel either ideologically devoted to or physically threatened by Bouattia’s comments regard the dispute as a remote struggle unrelated to their own interests, conducted by people they have never heard of.
Last time an NUS president was forced to resign in 2011, he was facing widespread discontent among students for his perceived failure to resist tuition fee rises. Without similar popular pressure, Bouattia’s position will be not be threatened
News / International students complain of ‘impossible choice’ under Cambridge travel disruption policy28 March 2026
News / Rowers voice growing concerns about ‘red boat man’ 27 March 2026
News / Downing to demolish restaurant for new student accom27 March 2026
Comment / Not all is beautiful in the death of the ‘golden ticket’26 March 2026
News / Uni awarded University of Sanctuary accreditation26 March 2026







