podcasts
paper edition
subscriptions
Links

Andrew Tift

He stresses the importance of letting an idea “ferment for 4-5 months. Because painting is so time-consuming for me, I have to be really sure. I’m not what you could call a spontaneous artist – you could even say I was contrived. But that’s just my way.” The paintings themselves can take anything up to ten months, depending on size. Does he ever tire of portraits? The answer is swift: “No, never. Never, never, never. I can paint fifteen portraits and then start a landscape, but before I’ve even finished the landscape I want to go back to portraits again.”

Tift has been able to support himself with his art ever since graduating. He refers to himself as “lucky”, but it’s difficult not to feel that his honesty, with his sitters and himself, has deservedly got him where he is today. “You’ve got to be true to yourself. Keep it real, as Noel Gallagher would say,” he laughs. “I think students often feel obliged to do installation art or conceptual art, as if they’ve been told that that’s where the best art comes from.” Tift’s career may have run parallel to the ups and downs of the Emins

and Hirsts, but he has “always worked very much on my own.” Artistic influences, briefly mentioned, are Van Eke and Holbein, and he speaks admiringly of Hockney and Freud. At the end of the day, however, Tift is all about “painting one person, their memories and thoughts floating around them.” If he’s almost Parkinson, his paintings are indeed “almost like interviews. That’s when painting really gets interesting.”