podcasts
paper edition
subscriptions
Links

Fletcher gets a second term as existing sabbaticals all re-elected

Charlotte Richer remains in her post of Access Officer with the support of 56% of voters. She saw off competition from Sam Wakeford, a first year with professional access experience, James Robinson, who ran on Hadlow’s “Change You Can Believe In” slate, and Owen Holland of the Socialist Workers’ Party. Andrea Walko stays on as Welfare & Graduates Officer after receiving 64% of the vote, defeating LGBT Reps Co-ordinator Kaur Adamson. Adam Colligan continues unchallenged as Services Officer.

The two members of this year’s executive not standing for re-election were exchanged for similarly familiar CUSU faces. Women’s Officer Elly Shepherd is replaced by veteran Women’s Union activist Natalie Szarek, who very narrowly beat rival Rhian Keyse. Academic Affairs Officer Pete Coulthard was replaced by Ant Bagshaw, currently Chair of the CUSU Democracy and Development Team.

Emilia Melville and Steven Bland take over from Christine Berry and Dan Chandler as

Ethical Affairs co-Chairs. They defeated Hugh Burling, of the “Change You Can Believe In” slate, who proposed shifting the focus of the Ethical Affairs Committee from the Green issues to “protecting the transparency and – real – ethical integrity of CUSU projects.”

Few of the junior positions were contested. Emily Hammerton-Barry, Ria T.S. Hylton, Marcus King, Mark Wolfson and Fuad Musallam, all unchallenged, secured the posts of Higher Education Funding Officer, Mental Health Officer and Students, Disabilities Officer, Affiliations Officer and Student Unions Liaison Officer respectively. Kathryn Maude narrowly beat Nadia Islam to the post of Target Campaigns Officer.

Hadlow’s response to the election, in which he received less than a fifth of the vote, was mixed. He said, “It’s a shame that CUSU will continue to believe it can represent all students despite such low turnouts... Maybe CUSU needs some competition.” Arguing that CUSU “has no legitimacy and is a deeply undemocratic organisation”, Hadlow

noted that CUSU Council decisions are made by JCR and MCR representatives, but not sabbatical officers. He told Varsity that CUSU members “almost certainly have no idea... that they are electing representatives when they do so”, and that “this isn’t publicised, and it’s a scandal.”

Richard Power Sayeed

Posted on Friday 7 March 2008